As Xiaomi is preparing its launch of new product(s) next week (22nd July), it doesn’t stop people (or company) from “leaking” out information on the new product. In this case, the Xiaomi Mi4.
Not sure if the above picture is the final product (or even real) but it is already shown on an online company, Xiaomiworld.com, as Xiaomi Mi4. Not only that, it has the specs and some other pictures on this yet-to-announce device.
But I guess you might be more interested in the specs and pricing. For the pricing, if the website is accurate, a 32GB Mi4 will cost USD599.99 (S$745). This is not the typical pricing from Xiaomi as Xiaomi tends to price its product low.
Before you think that the pricing is inaccurate, lets look at the specs..
- Model Xiaomi: Mi4
- Color: Multi-Color-Option
- Operating System: MIUI V5 based on Android 4.4
- Network: GSM, WCDMA (HSUPA, HSDPA), FDD-LTE
- Band: GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz, WCDMA: 850/900/1900/2100MHz, LTE: Bands: 1800/2100/2600MHz
- Carrier: Unlocked
- Screen: 5.5 inch, 2K Quad HD (2560×1440 pixels), 538 PPI
- Processor: Qualcomm© Snapdragon™ 805 processor with 2.5GHz Quad-core
- CPU: RAM 3GB ROM 32GB
- Rear Camera: 16-Megapixel OIS camera
- Front Camera: 5-megapixel
- Battery Embedded: rechargeable 3200 mAh Li-Po battery
- SIM Card: micro SIM card slot (single)
Click Here to Check Out Xiaomi Mi4 on Xiaomiworld
It is not the full specs but enough to show that it is a high-end device. I am really curious about the dimension and weight of this device. BTW, there is no mention of an external card slot on this device.
It will be interesting to see how the consumers will react to Xiaomi if the pricing of this device is much higher than any of their handsets. On other news, Xiaomi might also introduce Mi3S during this product launch. This Mi3S might be of a lower price range (lower end product) than the Mi4. This might fill the gap for those who do not need a high-end product.
What I have mentioned are just speculation and might not be true. So, please don’t blame me if the actual device is different from what is stated here 🙂 .
[ad#img]
(source)